If you don't remember your password, you can reset it by entering your email address and clicking the Reset Password button. You will then receive an email that contains a secure link for resetting your password
If the address matches a valid account an email will be sent to __email__ with instructions for resetting your password
Purpose: To evaluate the return-to-play rate and performance level changes in National Football League (NFL) athletes after a surgically treated pectoralis major muscle (PMM) tear.
Methods: A descriptive epidemiologic study was conducted. All NFL players from 1933 to 2013 were reviewed for surgically treated PMM tears. Age at injury, height, weight, body mass index, date of injury, position played, draft selection, and total seasons played were recorded. Return to play was assessed for the entire cohort, as well as by position. Performance analysis before and after injury was also conducted for the entire cohort, as well as by position and draft selection. Data analysis was performed with the paired-samples t test, with P < .05 considered statistically significant.
Results: Our review of 80 NFL seasons from 1933 to 2013 provided a total of 55 instances of PMM tears. All instances occurred between the time frame of 2004 and 2012. After exclusions, 24 instances unique to 24 NFL athletes were confirmed by 2 separate investigators and these athletes were included as our final study cohort. Of the 24 players identified to have a surgically repaired PMM tear, 20 (83%) returned to play. The mean return-to-play period was 302 ± 128 days. The mean difference in performance scores before versus after PMM injury was 171.33 and was statistically significant, with P = .0330.
Conclusions: In this study, there was an 83% return-to-play rate after surgical repair of PMM tears. Although we found a statistically significant decrease in player performance after surgery, this difference was no longer seen after players were stratified by position type and draft selection.
Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Injury to the pectoralis major muscle (PMM) is infrequent, with 1 study reporting an incidence of just under 400 injuries over a 200-year period.
Because high-performance athletes routinely participate in training regimens designed to optimize strength and speed, they may be at a greater risk for PMM tears that subsequently require surgical repair.
Injury to the PMM has different implications for an athlete depending on the position played—for example, players who rely on repetitive movements from their upper extremities and are significantly impaired by an injury to their PMM. These injuries may have implications beyond athlete performance, affecting career longevity and thus potential earnings for the athlete.
Although return to play and performance after injury to the anterior cruciate ligament and ulnar collateral ligament have been thoroughly studied, to date there is a paucity of literature on PMM injuries. In 2014, Tarity et al.
This study, by Wise et al., also assessed incidence, return to play, and performance of athletes after PMM injury.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the return-to-play rate and performance level changes in NFL athletes after a surgically treated PMM tear. We hypothesized that the return-to-play rate would be high and that the performance level, before and after injury, would not differ in patients with surgically treated PMM tears.
A descriptive epidemiologic study was conducted of all athletes who played in the NFL from 1933 to 2013 (80 seasons). All player movements to and from the injury reserved list and those who were reported to have missed games specifically because of injuries were reviewed for PMM tears using a publicly available archive, https://www.prosportstransactions.com. After the identification of PMM tears, all injuries were reviewed for treatment management, and only athletes whose injuries were surgically treated were included in the final study cohort. Confirmation was sought through other reputable sources that included but were not limited to reports and articles conveyed by ESPN.com, NFL.com, and pro-football-reference.com. This methodology has been adopted and used in other published studies on return to play and athletic performance after a musculoskeletal injury.
All searches were conducted and confirmed by 2 independent blinded investigators (H.F. and R.M.) to limit bias.
For each surgically treated PMM tear, the following data were collected: age at injury, height, weight, body mass index, date of injury, position played, draft selection, and total seasons played. Players who returned to play were defined as those who played at least 1 regular-season NFL game after surgical treatment of their PMM tear. All surgically repaired PMM tears were included in our calculation. Return to play was assessed for the entire cohort, as well as stratified by position (e.g., linebacker and defense vs offense). Performance analysis before and after injury was also conducted for the entire cohort, as well as stratified by offense versus defense and draft selection (round 1 or 2 vs round 3 or later). Performance scores, before and after injury, were determined based on previously published calculations for offensive and defensive players in a previous study by McGinniss et al.
Appendix Figure 1 provides the calculation for the performance score described by McGinniss et al.
Data analysis was performed with the paired-samples t test, P < .05 deemed statistically significant. SPSS software (version 25; IBM, Armonk, NY) was used for statistical analysis.
From our review of 80 NFL seasons from 1933 to 2013, we noted a total of 55 instances of PMM tears between 2004 and 2012. After exclusions, 24 instances unique to 24 NFL athletes were confirmed by 2 separate investigators as surgically repaired PMM tears; these athletes were included in our final study cohort. The mean cohort age at the time of injury, height, weight, and body mass index were 27.4 ± 3.5 years, 1.91 ± 0.06 m, 124.5 ± 18.09 kg, and 34.2 ± 3.88, respectfully. Table 1 provides a complete summary of all other descriptive statistics for our study cohort. Figure 1 is a representation of the yearly incidence of PMM injuries, with the greatest number of injuries occurring in 2011. From 2004 through 2007, there was an incidence of 2.5 PMM tears per year, as compared with an incidence of 2.8 PMM tears per year between 2008 and 2012. Most players noted to have PMM tears played the linebacker position on defense (n = 8, 33%). Those playing on offense had the least reported injuries, and specifically, among players in the offensive guard position, only 1 player (4%) was impacted.
It should be noted that no individual player returned to play during the same season as the injury or surgical repair. Overall, 20 of the 24 players identified to have a surgically repaired PMM tear (83%) returned to play; of the players who did not return to play, all played defensive positions (2 linebackers and 2 defensive backs). A complete summary of return-to-play rates, overall and by position, is provided in Table 2. The mean return-to-play period was 302 ± 128 days for the overall cohort, with defensive players most impacted with respect to the total number of PMM tears (n = 19), total time away from play (4,725 days), and inability to return to play (100% of players unable to return played defensive positions). Table 3 presents these results in greater detail.
Table 2Return-to-Play Rate by Specific Position and Overall
Finally, performance scores before injury and after injury were assessed. Regarding the entire group, the mean performance score was 299.26 (range, 0 to 1,301.1; median, 72.5; standard deviation, 408.6) for the cohort prior to injury and 127.94 (range, –2.4 to 724.2; median, 28.5; standard deviation, 199.3) following the return to play after surgically repaired PMM injury. This mean difference of 171.33 in performance scores was statistically significant, with P = .0330. Table 4 provides a complete summary of performance scores, before and after injury, of the entire cohort, as well as stratified by position type (offensive and defensive) and draft selection (rounds 1 or 2 vs round 3 or later).
Table 4Performance Analysis Before and After Pectoralis Major Injury
Our results support findings from previous work that have reported a rising incidence of PMM tears. From 2004 through 2007, there was an incident rate of 2.5 tears per year, as compared with an incident rate of 2.8 tears per year between 2008 and 2012. Thus, an increase of 12% was seen between these 2 time frames, with the greatest number of injuries occurring in 2011 in our cohort. The return-to-play rate in our study was 83%, which is similar to that reported by Wise et al.,
at 85.7%. About 79% of the cohort were athletes who played a defensive position, with the linebacker position being the position most impacted in our analysis. Our study showed similar findings to other studies that have reported linebackers and other positions on the defensive side to be more susceptible to PMM tears.
When we evaluated player performance scores before and after injury, we noted statistically significant differences when we assessed the entire cohort (P = .0330), which is a unique finding compared with the results of Wise et al., who found no differences before versus after injury. However, in our study, no differences were appreciated once we stratified for position played (offense vs defense), as well as round drafted (round 1 or 2 vs round 3 or later). These data can be an additional reference point for orthopaedic surgeons and rehabilitation staff who work closely with professional athletes during the recovery process and can help set realistic expectations regarding return to play and performance after surgery.
Therefore, our principal purpose was to evaluate the return-to-play rate after surgically treated PMM tears and compare levels of performance before and after injury. We also looked to characterize other factors that may increase a player’s propensity for PMM injury.
The limitations of this study include the low incidence rate of PMM injury, which can influence the overall power of the study, and thus, statistically significant differences may not be discernible. However, our sample size was larger than or approximately equivalent to the sample sizes of many previously published investigations on return to play.
A second limitation is associated with the use of a publicly available database for our cohort catchment, which leads to limited data regarding the severity of the PMM tear, exact MOI, and other concomitant injuries, as well as details regarding the operative techniques used to treat these injuries. Third, our findings may not be generalizable to other subsets of athletes who are not professional athletes (i.e., collegiate, high school, or recreational athletes) and further investigation is indicated. Finally, it is important to note that although a thorough review was conducted by the 2 investigators, there is always a risk of missed surgically treated PMM tears. However, prior studies investigating musculoskeletal injuries used a similar methodology to that used in our investigation.
In this study, there was an 83% returnto-play rate after surgical repair of PMM tears. Although we found a statistically significant decrease in player performance after surgery, this difference was no longer seen after players were stratified by position type and draft selection.
The authors report the following potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding: N.G.G. receives honoraria from DJO and Arthrex. D.H.S. is a paid consultant for Zimmer Biomet and Stryker/Tornier. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material.