Purpose
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Level of Evidence
Methods
Patients
Operating Methods

Evaluation Methods
Statistical Analysis
Calculation of Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptoms State (PASS) Threshold Scores
Score | MCID |
---|---|
Pedi-IKDC | 9.25 |
Lysholm | 12.85 |
KOOS Symptoms | 9.30 |
KOOS Pain | 8.60 |
KOOS Daily Living | 8.10 |
KOOS Sport | 16.25 |
KOOS Quality of life | 14.60 |
PROMs | PASS | Sensibility (%) | Specificity (%) | AUC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pedi-IKDC | 66.17 | 66.7 | 100.0 | 0.84 |
Lysholm | 86 | 100.0 | 88.9 | 0.96 |
KOOS Symptoms | 45.68 | 66.7 | 97.2 | 0.86 |
KOOS Pain | 88.89 | 100.0 | 91.7 | 0.96 |
KOOS Daily Living | 77.22 | 66.7 | 97.2 | 0.88 |
KOOS Sport | 80 | 100.0 | 66.7 | 0.89 |
KOOS Quality of Life | 75 | 100.0 | 80.6 | 0.93 |
Results
Total (n = 40) | Method A (n=20) | Method B (n=20) | P value (A vs B) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sex (% male) | 32 (80%) | 14 (70%) | 18 (90%) | 0.24 |
Injured side (% left) | 23 (58%) | 12 (60%) | 11 (55%) | 1 |
Average age, y | 13.8 ± 1.4 [9.8-16.5] | 13.6 ± 1.7 [9.8-16.5] | 14 ± 1.2 [10.9-16.1] | .35 |
Average height, cm | 165 ± 12 [138-186] | 162 ± 12 [141-183] | 167 ± 11 [138-186] | .22 |
Average weight, kg | 54 ± 11 [30-85] | 51 ± 11 [32-72] | 56 ± 12 [30-85] | .07 |
Average BMI | 19.6 ± 2.6 [15.1-27.8] | 19.2 ± 2.6 [15.1-26.4] | 20 ± 2.7 [15.6-27.8] | .28 |
Preoperative Data (n = 39) | Postoperative Data (n = 39) | P Value | |
---|---|---|---|
Clinical examination | |||
Lachman test | |||
Hard | 1 (3%) | 36 (92%) | |
Soft | 37 (94%) | 1 (3%) | <.001 |
Delayed hard | 1 (3%) | 2 (5%) | |
Pivot shift | |||
0 | 1 (3%) | 37 (95%) | |
Glide | 7 (18%) | 2 (5%) | |
++ | 13 (33%) | 0 | .04 |
+++ | 14 (36%) | 0 | |
Nontestable | 4 (10%) | 0 | |
Differential anterior laxity, mm | |||
Mean ± SD [min-max] | 6.9 ± 1.2 [4-10] | 1.7 ± 1.6 [–2 to 5] | <.0001 |
Median | 7.0 | 2.0 | |
Clinical score | |||
Pedi-IKDC (/100) | |||
Mean ± SD [min-max] | 58 ± 14 [33-93] | 89 ± 9 [66-100] | |
Median | 59 | 93 | <.0001 |
≥MCID | 35 (89%) | ||
≥PASS | 37 (95%) | ||
KOOS symptom (/100) | |||
Mean ± SD [min-max] | 81 ± 13 [50-100] | 91 ± 14 [36-100] | |
Median | 82 | 96 | <.0001 |
≥MCID | 21 (53%) | ||
≥PASS | 33 (85%) | ||
KOOS pain (/100) | |||
Mean ± SD [min-max] | 80 ± 15 [39-100] | 95 ± 10 [56-100] | |
Median | 81 | 100 | <.0001 |
≥MCID | 25 (64%) | ||
≥PASS | 34 (87%) | ||
KOOS daily living (/100) | |||
Mean ± SD [min-max] | 88 ± 13 [56-100] | 97 ± 6 [72-100] | |
Median | 90 | 100 | <.0001 |
≥MCID | 17 (44%) | ||
≥PASS | 38 (97%) | ||
KOOS sports (/100) | |||
Mean ± SD [min-max] | 47 ± 24 [0-95] | 85 ± 18 [25-100] | |
Median | 45 | 95 | <.0001 |
≥MCID | 28 (71%) | ||
≥PASS | 27 (69%) | ||
KOOS quality of life (/100) | |||
Mean ± SD [min-max] | 35 ± 24 [0-100] | 88 ± 16 [35-100] | |
Median | 31 | 94 | <.0001 |
≥MCID | 35 (90%) | ||
≥PASS | 33 (85%) | ||
Lysholm (/100) | |||
Mean ± SD [min-max] | 70 ± 15 [40-100] | 92 ± 15 [13-100] | |
Median | 71 | 95 | <.0001 |
≥MCID | 30 (77%) | ||
≥PASS | 33 (85%) | ||
Tegner (/10) | |||
Mean ± SD [min-max] | 7.2 ± 1 [4-10] | 6.8 ± 1.8 [3-10] | |
Median | 7.0 | 7.0 | .06 |
Tegner Score | |||
---|---|---|---|
Postoperative < Pretrauma (n = 15) | Postoperative ≥ Pretrauma (n = 32) | P Value | |
Male | 11 (73%) | 19 (83%) | .62 |
BMI | 20 ± 3 [17-28] | 19 ± 2 [15-22] | .37 |
Preoperative Tegner (/10) | 7 ± 1 [6-10] | 7 ± 1 [4-10] | .71 |
Meniscal lesion | 8 (53%) | 13 (57%) | .94 |
Graft rupture or contralateral ACL rupture | 6 (40%) | 0 | .05 |

Complications | Total (n = 39) | Method A (n = 19) | Method B (n = 20) | P Value (A vs B) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Graft failure | 1 (2.6%) | 0 | 1 (5%) | 1 |
Meniscal suture failure | 2 (5.1%) | 1 (5.3%) | 1 (5%) | 1 |
Arthrofibrosis | 2 (5.1%) | 1 (5.3%) | 1 (5%) | 1 |
Growth disorders | 2 (5.1%) | 1 (5.3%) | 1 (5%) | 1 |
With contralateral epiphysiodesis | 1 (2.6%) | 1 (5.3%) | 0 | 1 |
Discussion
- Fourman M.S.
- Hassan S.G.
- Roach J.W.
- Grudziak J.S.
Study | Mean Follow-up, y | Lateral Extra-Articular Procedure | Surgical Technique | Femoral Fixation (F) and Tibial Fixation (T) | Graft Rupture | Mean Tegner | Mean Lysholm | Mean IKDC | Growth Disorder |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current study, n = 39 | 4.8 | Yes | ST + FL ST/G + G | F: Intraepiphyseal T: transphyseal | 2.5% | 6.8 | 90 | 88 | 5.4% |
Lanzetti et al., 2020, 33 n = 42 | 8 | Yes | ST/G + G | F: over the top T: Intraepiphyseal | 4.8% | 8 | 94.8 | 94.8 | 4.8% |
Wilson et al., 2019, 34 n = 61 | 3.2 | Yes | ST/G + FL | F: transphyseal T: transphyseal | 5.3% | NA | NA | 91.2 | 5.5% |
Roberti di Sarsina et al., 2019, 35 n = 20 | 4.5 | Yes | ST/G + G | F: over the top T: Intraepiphyseal | 0% | 7 | 100 | NA | 15% |
Kocher et al., 2018, 36 n = 137 | 6.2 | Yes | Mac FL | F: over the top T: extraosseous | 6.6% | 7.8 | 93.4 | 93.3 | 0% |
Willimon et al., 2015, 37 n = 22 | 3 | Yes | Mac FL | F: over the top T: extraosseous | 14% | 8 | 95 | 96.5 | 0% |
Fourman et al., 2021 50
Anatomic all-epiphyseal ACL reconstruction with “inside-out” femoral tunnel placement in immature patients yields high return to sport rates and functional outcome scores a minimum of 24 months after reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021; 29: 4251-4260 | 5 | No | ST/G allograft | F: Intraepiphyseal T: Intraepiphyseal | 13.2% | NA | NA | 91.3 | 26.5% |
Nagai et al., 2020, 51 n = 35 | 2.2 | No | NA | F: Over the top T: transphyseal | 14.3% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Astur et al., 2018, 60 n = 46 | Minimum 0.5 | No | ST/G | F: transphyseal T: transphyseal | 24.6% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Razi et al., 2019, 52 n = 31 | 6 | No | ST allograft | F: Intraepiphyseal T: transphyseal | NA | NA | NA | 85 | 3.2% |
SFA prospective, 2018, 54 n = 100 (multicenter) | 2 | No | Multicenter | Multicenter | 9% | 7.8 | 93 | 92 | NA |
Dekker et al., 2017, 55 n = 112 | 4 | No | ST/G BPTB | F: Intraepiphyseal + transphyseal T: transphyseal | 19% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Schmale et al., 2014, 56 n = 29 | 4 | No | 4ST Allograft | F: transphyseal T: transphyseal | 13.8% | 7 | NA | NA | 0% |
- Ahn J.H.
- Koh I.J.
- McGarry M.H.
- Patel N.A.
- Lin C.C.
- Lee T.Q.
- Fourman M.S.
- Hassan S.G.
- Roach J.W.
- Grudziak J.S.

- Sonnery-Cottet B.
- Praz C.
- Rosenstiel N.
- et al.
Limitations
Conclusions
Supplementary Data
- ICMJE author disclosure forms
References
- Managing anterior cruciate ligament deficiency in the skeletally immature individual: A systematic review of the literature.Clin J Sport Med. 2006; 16: 457-464
- The natural history and treatment of rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament in children and adolescents. A prospective review.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84: 38-41
- Management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in skeletally immature individuals.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012; 42: 172-183
- The conservative treatment of complete tears of the anterior cruciate ligament in skeletally immature patients.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995; 77: 890-894
- Prevalence and incidence of new meniscus and cartilage injuries after a nonoperative treatment algorithm for ACL tears in skeletally immature children: A prospective MRI study.Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41: 1771-1779
- Early operative versus delayed operative versus nonoperative treatment of pediatric and adolescent anterior cruciate ligament injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Sports Med. 2021; 49: 4008-4017
- Anterior cruciate ligament injury in pediatric and adolescent soccer players: An analysis of insurance data.J Pediatr Orthop. 2004; 24: 623-628
- The risk for a cruciate ligament injury of the knee in adolescents and young adults: A population-based cohort study of 46 500 people with a 9 year follow-up.Br J Sports Med. 2008; 42: 422-426
- Anterior cruciate ligament tears in children.Surgeon. 2013; 11: 59-62
- Pediatric sports injuries: An age comparison of children versus adolescents.Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41: 1922-1929
- Fifteen-year survival of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged 18 years and younger.Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44: 384-392
- Youth sports anterior cruciate ligament and knee injury epidemiology: Who is getting injured? In what sports? When?.Clin Sports Med. 2011; 30: 691-706
- 20 years of pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in New York State.Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 675-680
- Anterior cruciate ligament tears in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis of nonoperative versus operative treatment.Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 2769-2776
- Patient predictors of early revision surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A cohort study of 16,930 patients with 2-year follow-up.Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43: 121-127
- Exploring the high reinjury rate in younger patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44: 2827-2832
- Long-term evaluation of pediatric ACL reconstruction: High risk of further surgery but a restrictive postoperative management was related to a lower revision rate.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022; 142: 1951-1961
- Growth disturbances without growth arrest after ACL reconstruction in children.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010; 18: 1496-1500
- 2018 International Olympic Committee consensus statement on prevention, diagnosis and management of paediatric anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries.Br J Sports Med. 2018; 52: 422-438
- Risk factors for failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a pediatric population: A prediction algorithm.Orthop J Sports Med. 2021; 92325967121991165
- The involvement of the anterolateral ligament in rotational control of the knee.Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44: 1209-1214
- Hamstring autograft versus patellar tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction: Is there a difference in graft failure rate? A meta-analysis of 47,613 patients.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017; 475: 2459-2468
- Recherches Cliniques et Expérimentales Sur Les Épanchements Sanguins Du Genou Par Entorse.Aux Bureaux du progrès médical, Paris1879
- The origin of the knee anterolateral ligament discovery: A translation of Segond’s original work with commentary.Arthroscopy. 2019; 35: 684-690
- Anatomy of the anterolateral ligament of the knee.J Anat. 2013; 223: 321-328
- Prevalence and classification of injuries of anterolateral complex in acute anterior cruciate ligament tears.Arthroscopy. 2017; 33: 147-154
- Magnetic resonance imaging-based prevalence of anterolateral ligament abnormalities and associated injuries in knees with acute anterior cruciate ligament injury.J Knee Surg. 2019; 32: 866-871
- Behavior of the anterolateral structures of the knee during internal rotation.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015; 101: 523-528
- Anterolateral ligament of the knee: Diagnosis, indications, technique, outcomes.Arthroscopy. 2019; 35: 302-303
- The anterolateral ligament of the knee: An updated systematic review of anatomy, biomechanics, and clinical outcomes.Arthroscopy. 2021; 37: 1654-1666
- Anterolateral ligament reconstruction is associated with significantly reduced ACL graft rupture rates at a minimum follow-up of 2 years: A prospective comparative study of 502 patients from the SANTI study group.Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45: 1547-1557
- Long-term graft rupture rates after combined ACL and anterolateral ligament reconstruction versus isolated ACL reconstruction: A matched-pair analysis from the SANTI study group.Am J Sports Med. 2021; 49: 2889-2897
- Over the top anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with open physes: A long-term follow-up study.Int Orthop. 2020; 44: 771-778
- Combined transphyseal and lateral extra-articular pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A novel technique to reduce ACL reinjury while allowing for growth.Am J Sports Med. 2019; 47: 3356-3364
- Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with an all-epiphyseal “over-the-top” technique is safe and shows low rate of failure in skeletally immature athletes.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019; 27: 498-506
- Outcomes of physeal-sparing ACL reconstruction with iliotibial band autograft in skeletally immature prepubescent children.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018; 100: 1087-1094
- Micheli Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature youths: A retrospective case series with a mean 3-year follow-up.Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43: 2974-2981
- Combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction.Arthrosc Tech. 2016; 5: e1253-e1259
- Minimally invasive modified Lemaire tenodesis.Arthrosc Tech. 2021; 10: e29-e36
- Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985; 198: 43-49
- Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist.Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA1959
- Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale.Am J Sports Med. 1982; 10: 150-154
- Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of a modified International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (Pedi-IKDC) in children with knee disorders.Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39: 933-939
- The Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee (Pedi-IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form: Normative data.Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45: 527-534
- Measurement variance in limb length discrepancy: Clinical and radiographic assessment of interobserver and intraobserver variability.J Pediatr Orthop. 2005; 25: 197-201
- Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty: Can leg length be satisfactorily controlled via anterior approach without a traction table? Evaluation in 56 patients with EOS 3D.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018; 104: 1143-1148
- Reproducibility of length measurements of the lower limb by using EOSTM.Musculoskelet Surg. 2018; 102: 165-171
- Repair of meniscal ramp lesions through a posteromedial portal during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Outcome study with a minimum 2-year follow-up.Arthroscopy. 2016; 32: 2269-2277
- All-inside double-sided suture repair for longitudinal meniscal tears.Arthrosc Tech. 2021; 10: e2043-e2048
- Anatomic all-epiphyseal ACL reconstruction with “inside-out” femoral tunnel placement in immature patients yields high return to sport rates and functional outcome scores a minimum of 24 months after reconstruction.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021; 29: 4251-4260
- Over-the-top ACL reconstruction restores anterior and rotatory knee laxity in skeletally immature individuals and revision settings.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020; 28: 538-543
- Allograft or autograft in skeletally immature anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A prospective evaluation using both partial and complete transphyseal techniques.J Orthop Surg Res. 2019; 14: 85
- Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients: A systematic review.Bone Joint J. 2017; 99-B: 1053-1060
- Return to sport and re-tears after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in children and adolescents.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018; 104: S183-S188
- Return to sport after pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and its effect on subsequent anterior cruciate ligament injury.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017; 99: 897-904
- High satisfaction yet decreased activity 4 years after transphyseal ACL reconstruction.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472: 2168-2174
- Different anterolateral procedures have variable impact on knee kinematics and stability when performed in combination with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.J ISAKOS. 2021; 6: 74-81
- Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with lateral extra-articular tenodesis is effective in restoring knee stability in a chronic, complex anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee model: A cadaveric biomechanical study.Arthroscopy. 2021; 37: 2220-2234
- A randomized controlled trial of bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without lateral extra-articular tenodesis: 19-year clinical and radiological follow-up.Am J Sports Med. 2020; 48: 1665-1672
- Increased incidence of anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery in paediatric verses adult population.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 26: 1362-1366
- Management and complications of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in skeletally immature patients: Survey of the Herodicus Society and The ACL Study Group.J Pediatr Orthop. 2002; 22: 452-457
- Growth abnormalities following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the skeletally immature patient: A systematic review.Arthroscopy. 2016; 32: 1714-1723
- Pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review of transphyseal versus physeal-sparing techniques.Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45: 488-494
- MRI assessment of growth disturbances after ACL reconstruction in children with open growth plates—Prospective multicenter study of 100 patients.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018; 104: S175-S181
- ACL Graft and contralateral ACL tear risk within ten years following reconstruction: A systematic review.JBJS Rev. 2015; 3
- “I never made it to the pros…” Return to sport and becoming an elite athlete after pediatric and adolescent anterior cruciate ligament injury Current evidence and future directions.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 26: 1011-1018
- Return to sport in the younger patient with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Orthop J Sports Med. 2017; 52325967117703399
- Anterior Cruciate ligament injury, return to play, and reinjury in the elite collegiate athlete: Analysis of an NCAA Division I cohort.Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 1638-1643
- Ramp lesions in ACL deficient knees in children and adolescent population: A high prevalence confirmed in intercondylar and posteromedial exploration.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 26: 1074-1079
- Epidemiological evaluation of meniscal ramp lesions in 3214 anterior cruciate ligament–injured knees from the SANTI Study Group database: A risk factor analysis and study of secondary meniscectomy rates following 769 ramp repairs.Am J Sports Med. 2018; 46: 3189-3197
- Prevalence and detection of meniscal ramp lesions in pediatric anterior cruciate ligament–deficient knees.Am J Sports Med. 2021; 49: 1822-1826
- Risk factors for ramp lesions of the medial meniscus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Sports Med. 2021; 49: 3749-3757
Article info
Publication history
Footnotes
The authors report the following potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding: M.T. and B.S.-C. report personal fees from Arthrex during the conduct of the study and outside the submitted work. J.-M.F. reports nonfinancial support from Arthrex, New Clip Technics, and X Nov, outside the submitted work. DRE Ramsay Santé funds the studies as the Centre Orthopédique Santy. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material.
Identification
Copyright
User license
Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
Permitted
For non-commercial purposes:
- Read, print & download
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article (private use only, not for distribution)
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
Not Permitted
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
- Distribute translations or adaptations of the article
Elsevier's open access license policy